<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Summary Judgment &#8211; PRESLAW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preslaw.info/tag/summary-judgment/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preslaw.info</link>
	<description>Exploring the Legal Legacy of Elvis Aaron Presley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">157821377</site>	<item>
		<title>Estate of Pepper v. Whitehead (2012) [Elvis Memorabilia]</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2012-elvis-memorabilia</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2012-elvis-memorabilia#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Elvis Memorabilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conditional Gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statute of Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=1556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In this rather fascinating case, the Court is having to decide who rightfully owns <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2012-elvis-memorabilia" title="Estate of Pepper v. Whitehead (2012) [Elvis Memorabilia]">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2012-elvis-memorabilia/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1556</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rodgers and Hammerstein Organization v. UMG Recordings, Inc. (2001)</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/rodgers-and-hammerstein-organization-v-umg-recordings-inc-2001</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/rodgers-and-hammerstein-organization-v-umg-recordings-inc-2001#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor IP Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Plaintiff songwriters and music publishers (including Leiber and Stoller, Elvis Presley Music, and Gladys <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/rodgers-and-hammerstein-organization-v-umg-recordings-inc-2001" title="Rodgers and Hammerstein Organization v. UMG Recordings, Inc. (2001)">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/rodgers-and-hammerstein-organization-v-umg-recordings-inc-2001/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">546</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presley v. County of Nassau (1990) [Posthumous Concert Tickets]</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-county-of-nassau-1990</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-county-of-nassau-1990#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Posthumous Concert Tickets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate of Elvis Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Elvis&#8217; Estate sues County of Nassau et al. for recovery of proceeds from unrefunded <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/presley-v-county-of-nassau-1990" title="Presley v. County of Nassau (1990) [Posthumous Concert Tickets]">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-county-of-nassau-1990/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">588</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presley v. Hanks (1989) [Illegitimate Daughter]</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-hanks-1989-illegitimate-daughter-case</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-hanks-1989-illegitimate-daughter-case#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2017 22:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Wills and Estates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wills]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here, the &#8220;Presley&#8221; is Deborah Delaine Presley, Plaintiff, who, claiming to be the illegitimate <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/presley-v-hanks-1989-illegitimate-daughter-case" title="Presley v. Hanks (1989) [Illegitimate Daughter]">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-hanks-1989-illegitimate-daughter-case/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">651</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>State ex rel. Elvis Presley Intl. Meml. Found. v. Crowell (1987)</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/state-ex-rel-elvis-presley-intl-meml-found-v-crowell-1987</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/state-ex-rel-elvis-presley-intl-meml-found-v-crowell-1987#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 04:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Right of Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Descent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right of Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Elvis&#8217; Estate intervenes on behalf of defendant in case where a not-for-profit corporation (Elvis <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/state-ex-rel-elvis-presley-intl-meml-found-v-crowell-1987" title="State ex rel. Elvis Presley Intl. Meml. Found. v. Crowell (1987)">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/state-ex-rel-elvis-presley-intl-meml-found-v-crowell-1987/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">674</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. (1982)</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/factors-etc-inc-v-pro-arts-inc-1982</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/factors-etc-inc-v-pro-arts-inc-1982#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA["In Memory" Poster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari for the second time and less than a <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/factors-etc-inc-v-pro-arts-inc-1982" title="Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. (1982)">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/factors-etc-inc-v-pro-arts-inc-1982/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">632</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hoste v. Radio Corporation of America (1981)</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/hoste-v-radio-corp-of-america-1981</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/hoste-v-radio-corp-of-america-1981#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Minor IP Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statute of Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hoste, songwriter, seeks damages for copyright infringement, claiming Elvis performed a song (&#8220;I&#8217;m Yours&#8221;) <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/hoste-v-radio-corp-of-america-1981" title="Hoste v. Radio Corporation of America (1981)">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/hoste-v-radio-corp-of-america-1981/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">542</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apigram Publishing Co. v. Factors Etc., Inc. (1980)</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/apigram-publishing-co-v-factors-etc-inc-1980</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/apigram-publishing-co-v-factors-etc-inc-1980#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Right of Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In this case, both Plaintiffs and Defendants are filing motions for summary judgment. Apigram <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/apigram-publishing-co-v-factors-etc-inc-1980" title="Apigram Publishing Co. v. Factors Etc., Inc. (1980)">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/apigram-publishing-co-v-factors-etc-inc-1980/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">406</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. (1980)</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/factors-etc-inc-v-pro-arts-inc-1980</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/factors-etc-inc-v-pro-arts-inc-1980#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA["In Memory" Poster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Plaintiffs are moving for summary judgment, seeking a permanent injunction against the Defendants and <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/factors-etc-inc-v-pro-arts-inc-1980" title="Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. (1980)">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/factors-etc-inc-v-pro-arts-inc-1980/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">628</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
