<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Property &#8211; PRESLAW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preslaw.info/category/cases/property/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preslaw.info</link>
	<description>Exploring the Legal Legacy of Elvis Aaron Presley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:48:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">157821377</site>	<item>
		<title>Estate of Pepper v. Whitehead (2015) [Elvis Memorabilia]</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2015</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2015#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Elvis Memorabilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conditional Gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reversion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=1552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In this rather fascinating case, the Court is having to decide who rightfully owns <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2015" title="Estate of Pepper v. Whitehead (2015) [Elvis Memorabilia]">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2015/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1552</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estate of Pepper v. Whitehead (2012) [Elvis Memorabilia]</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2012-elvis-memorabilia</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2012-elvis-memorabilia#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Elvis Memorabilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conditional Gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statute of Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=1556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In this rather fascinating case, the Court is having to decide who rightfully owns <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2012-elvis-memorabilia" title="Estate of Pepper v. Whitehead (2012) [Elvis Memorabilia]">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/estate-of-pepper-v-whitehead-2012-elvis-memorabilia/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1556</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presley v. County of Nassau (1990) [Posthumous Concert Tickets]</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-county-of-nassau-1990</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-county-of-nassau-1990#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Posthumous Concert Tickets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate of Elvis Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Elvis&#8217; Estate sues County of Nassau et al. for recovery of proceeds from unrefunded <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/presley-v-county-of-nassau-1990" title="Presley v. County of Nassau (1990) [Posthumous Concert Tickets]">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-county-of-nassau-1990/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">588</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presley v. City of Memphis (1988) [Posthumous Concert Tickets]</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-city-of-memphis-1988</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-city-of-memphis-1988#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Posthumous Concert Tickets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate of Elvis Presley]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Elvis&#8217; Estate sues his hometown city of Memphis, et al., for recovery of proceeds <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/presley-v-city-of-memphis-1988" title="Presley v. City of Memphis (1988) [Posthumous Concert Tickets]">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/presley-v-city-of-memphis-1988/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">585</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Carolina State Treasurer v. City of Asheville (1983) [Posthumous Concert Tickets]</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/north-carolina-state-treasurer-v-city-of-asheville-1983</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/north-carolina-state-treasurer-v-city-of-asheville-1983#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Posthumous Concert Tickets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concert Tickets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate of Elvis Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The North Carolina State Treasurer brought an interpleader action as custodian of escheat fund <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/north-carolina-state-treasurer-v-city-of-asheville-1983" title="North Carolina State Treasurer v. City of Asheville (1983) [Posthumous Concert Tickets]">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/north-carolina-state-treasurer-v-city-of-asheville-1983/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">574</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Audio, Inc. v. RCA Corp. (1972)</title>
		<link>http://preslaw.info/current-audio-inc-v-rca-corp-1972</link>
					<comments>http://preslaw.info/current-audio-inc-v-rca-corp-1972#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[preslaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Declaratory Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right of Publicity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s568299532.onlinehome.us/?p=409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In this case, the publisher of an audio magazine, which was to include a <a class="mh-excerpt-more" href="http://preslaw.info/current-audio-inc-v-rca-corp-1972" title="Current Audio, Inc. v. RCA Corp. (1972)">[...]</a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://preslaw.info/current-audio-inc-v-rca-corp-1972/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">409</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
